Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Angel: Blood and Trenches by John Byrne

Set in WWI!



I picked this one up because of the artwork actually. Not just the cover (above), but the artwork is a bit different than what I usually see, and very cool. John Byrne is the writer and artist for this one, and the graphics are actually pencilly looking. There's no real ink work. No clean lines. No real colour for most of it! The pictures look like sketches.

I think that's awesome!



The only colour that appears that departs from graphite - is the colour red. I'd say it was Sin City-esque but Sin City is so clean and sleek - this isn't. This is rough. And it works.



The artwork is great - what about the story?

Basically, Angel is in New York, reading some news articles about the war, and (without spoiling you too much) he sees "something" that he believes might require his attention on the front line. *ahem* vampires.

That's not really a spoiler, it was a pretty high chance the antagonists in the story would be vampiric. Or demonic.

Anyway, Angel gets himself on a boat and starts investigating while working as an ambulance driver.

Sound interesting? It is! Actually this is only a few pages but that just sounds enthralling to me. I want to know MORE. I wanted to see more of his interactions with the other people. I wanted more build-up. I want MORE backstory, more character tension, more every-day situations and how hard they are for him at that time. But what I got was still great. I just wanted more...

Angel as an ambo in WWI.


This story is more of a character study about Angel, dealing with his nature. This is a lot closer to his Angelus days than we usually saw in the series. Which is great. I like exploring Angel's past. I always wished there was more of it in the show - and a graphic novel form is the perfect media.

Byrne writes Angel very well. He's very reserved in this era - and has a lot less control over himself and his actions than the Angel we're used to. He's still trying to come to terms with himself. He's not there yet.




The story is pretty simple, though told in a not-quite-linear fashion which stops it from going dry too quickly. I liked Angel's headspace in this one - he flees a lot, he's not strong, and he's not quite in control. It's a great look at a character I love.

I recommend it.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Review: Canongate Myth Series, Books #1 - #3

Note: I'm not reviewing the content of any of The Myths today, just the external packaging.


The Myths is a long-term global publishing project where some of the world's most respected authors re-tell myths in a manner of their own choosing.



I was very excited when I first heard about this project from Scottish publishing house Canongate. Classic myths being retold in a contemporary way. Easily recognisable stories being handed to some of the best authors out there, so they can polish the meaning, breath new life into these ancient archtypes and make them accessible to modern audiences.

Awesome. And epic. This series only just started and it's planning to get to a century.

So of course I bought the hardcover box set, featured below. This set has the first three books; A Short History of Myth by Karen Armstrong, The Penelopiad by Margaret Atwood, Weight by Jeanette Winterson and also a small inclusion by Philip Pullman A Word or Two About Myth.

A Short History of Myth is more of an overview of myth in general, and what the myths we know today meant to different periods of our human history.

The Penelopiad Homer's Odyssey told from his wife's perspective

Weight The overlapping story of Atlas and Heracles, and a poignant take on the way Heracles tricked Atlas into taking back the world



The Myths!

So first we have the box, which is patterned with cave drawings, appropriately enough. There's also gold writing on the back, detailing the books, and the little Canongate Myths Symbol also in gold.
The box itself is made of thick board - not flimsy at all, I could probably rest my monitor on it.






The hardcovers each have decorative jackets. They look all the same inside the jackets.




I'm not sure if you can see the text, but the chapters are printed in a deep red. Some of the words in the foreward are also printed in the same deep red and the contents pages have the same theme... very pretty.



I bought the boxset and I'm more than pleased with it. The editions are of a high quality, some of the best editions i've seen in a while.


Just one last note: these books are more novellas, they do not take long to read, but they are worth it! Really recommend these, pick your favourite author up to see how they teach old dogs to play pianos.



Find out more about the myths series here:
http://www.themyths.co.uk/

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Review: On Writing by Stephen King



What is it about Kingy? I love him. I really do. He can write a story for billions of people and make it seem like he is in the room with me, in the chair across from my computer, with a beer in one hand and my dog sitting on his shoes.
He's so damn... accesible. And from someone who has written about everything from giant maneating spiders, to nazi-wannabes, to prison inmates, to murderous husbands... being accessible is one HELL of a skill!

Who wouldn't want some tips about writing from Stephen King?

This book isn't fiction, it's a memoir. It starts off with his stories from childhood, and morphs into a reader-friendly breakdown of The Elements of Style (E.B White and William Shrunk Jr.) While Elements is great as a revisionary tool, King's On Writing is a good way to see the elements in action.

He gives examples of what works and what doesn't. He does this in a general "you should be honest with your writing" way, all the way down to "see how adverbs kill this passage" way. Very handy.

He points the way to get more information on anything if you need it, uses personal experience to guide his answers and advice, and just gives easy tips to sharpen your quill.

One thing stood out for me though, and I mention this with a grin on my face; King advises that his characters take on the novel, and simply act on their own merits, and the storyline plays out from their interactions. That's why, and he alludes to this in Writing, many of his books are based on SITUATION and REACTION. There is a situation, and the book is about the character(s) reaction to that situation.

Now, sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't.

Desperation, this book is all reaction to a situation. And I read it, and I struggled with all the character POVs and it ended and I felt nothing. It didn't affect me at all. I'm not against what I call "character studies" (and I'll go into that a little further), but to please me they need to be tempered with some forward motion too.

Kingy's one of my favourite writers, hands down and tickets ripped, but sometimes his books don't land properly and I'm now attributing this to the fact he doesn't believe in plotting it out too much. By land properly, I mean end properly. This is in my opinion of course.

Rose Madder, definitely one of my favourite books, ends so strangely - it's reaction, not plot. Rosie's reaction to the initial situation is the main drive of the story. AND it's amazing! But the wrap up is odd to me - I won't spoil it, but pick it up, I know you'll see what I mean. The story-plane lands like it's hitting a cross wind on the runway.

Kingy also mentions that Rose isn't one of his favourites, because it was so heavily plot driven. I found that completely at odds with the book i've read about 20 times, if anything I would say Rose lacks plot because it's a character study. When I say character study, I mean this: the book is about Rosie. Rosie runs from her husband and rebuilds her life. To me, that's not plot driven. In a plot driven story, "Rosie runs from her husband and rebuilds her life" would be the start, leading onto her becoming a spy, or finding her true calling as a policeman, or solving a murder or something.
I have to stop talking about this book, that's for another day.


/digression



IT - this is another one that has that landing trouble. It's all going well, gelling together, and then suddenly the girl character (can't remember her name right now) sleeps with all the boy characters and IT's a giant spider or something. I still don't get it. It might be user error of course.

Sometimes SITUATION and REACTION work amazingly! See Firestarter. Amazing beginning middle and denouement. Characters are fleshed out with no problem, the story is a first class flight and a landing on a summer's day with no breeze to be felt.

See Misery, see Cujo... See mostly anything he writes. But sometimes, and just sometimes, his landings are off for me.

Anyway, I only mentioned the stories because of what Kingy wrote in Writing and I need to wrap this review up.

The memoir is a great tool for any aspiring writer, and a great way to get some answers to some FAQs. Kingy gives some amazing advice and lessons in the book, and most of all, he gives the advice in an inspiring and encouraging way.

Stephen King is so often unsung, when really he is just a great writer. Just because he's ACCESIBLE DAMN IT, just because everyone, even your twelve year old cousin reads him doesn't mean he's not amazing. Not everything that is popular is as vapid as Justin Bieber or Jersey Shore. Stephen King is definitely not dull, he can just reach people. And that's what writing is about, right?